This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Demotion

Joel Ibarra v. Bentley Mills, Inc.

Published: Mar. 1, 1997 | Result Date: Aug. 15, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC133033 –  $0

Judge

Ricardo A. Torres

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mario E. Diaz

John H. Ing


Defendant

Stephen M. MacPhail

Richard S. Rosenberg
(Ballard, Rosenberg, Golper & Savitt LLP)

Reed E. Schaper
(Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Lester M. Zackler M.D.
(medical)

Stephen T. Riley
(technical)

Michael P. Ward
(technical)

Defendant

David N. Glaser
(medical)

Facts

In 1981, plaintiff Joel Ibarra, a then 16-year-boy, was hired by defendant Bentley Mills, Inc. in the samples department of the company. In 1983, the plaintiff was transferred to the shipping department as a forklift driver. In 1993, the plaintiff was promoted to the day-shift supervisor in the department. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff was demoted to a forklift driver position in August 1994 as a result of continuing performance problems. Shortly after that demotion, the defendant claimed that the plaintiff allowed subordinates to drink beer during working hours and/or on company property. The plaintiff received a one week suspension for his participation in that incident. The plaintiff commenced a medical leave in September 1994 and failed to return to work at the end of his leave. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants based on sexual harassment, retaliation for opposing acts violative of the FEHA, and wrongful demotion in violation of public policy theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $250,000 immediately prior to trial. The defendant made no settlement offer.

Specials in Evidence

$498,000

Damages

The plaintiff requested compensatory damages for lost back and future wages and for emotional distress, and punitive damages.

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged emotional distress.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and one month after the case was filed.

Deliberation

5+ hours

Poll

9-3

Length

6 days


#79318

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390