This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Veterinary Malpractice
Negligent Testing

Janine Queller v. Conrad Ferreira

Published: Dec. 16, 2003 | Result Date: May 16, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: NC19794 Verdict –  $0

Judge

John Litton

Court

Tehama Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Richard A. Cardozo

Herman C. Meyer


Defendant

Linda H. Wyner

Kenneth C. Ward
(Severson & Werson)


Facts

In April 1998, the plaintiff agreed to purchase a 3-year-old quarterhorse nicknamed Deuce. The plaintiff sought a veterinarian who could conduct a pre-purchase examination to determine Deuce's health. She chose the defendant, Dr. Ferreira, upon a friend's recommendation. The seller made arrangements for the examination and the plaintiff never spoke to Dr. Ferreira and only received the pre-purchase examination form advising her that the Deuce's heart was normal. The plaintiff proceeded with the purchase, transferred Deuce to a facility near her home in Contra Costa County and arranged for training with plans to use the horse in competition. Deuce trained extensively for the next seven months, showing good stamina and no physical problems. In November 1998, Deuce injured his foot. It did not heal well and surgery was recommended. While preparing Deuce for surgery, a heart murmur was discovered so general anesthesia was avoided. A follow-up assessment at UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital revealed a heart defect for which no treatment was available. Deuce steadily declined over the next six months and eventually was euthanized in June 1999.

Settlement Discussions

Since there was no evidence of a breach of the standard of care, this case was not suitable for settlement.

Damages

The plaintiff identified her specials as the $6,000 purchase price of the horse plus a minimum of $10,000 for veterinary treatment, boarding costs and loss of use.

Deliberation

half hour

Poll

12-0

Length

three days


#79346

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390