This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

May 10, 1997

Construction
Construction Defects
Condominium Complex

Confidential

Settlement –  $3,567,500

Judge

James Kolts

Ross Hart

Court

L.A. Superior Van Nuys


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Matthew L. Grode

Leslie Steven Marks


Defendant

Richard H. Glucksman
(Chapman, Glucksman, Dean, Roeb & Barger)

Raymond Meyer Jr.
(Bremer, Whyte, Brown & O'Meara LLP)

Gordon F. Sausser

Jerome M. Wagner

Keith G. Bremer
(Bremer, Whyte, Brown & O'Meara LLP)

Teresa A. Libertino

David S. Schlueter

Carrin A. Gidekel

Michael T. O'Callaghan


Facts

In or about 1990, the defendant developer constructed a 23-unit condominium complex in Calabasas. Shortly after completion of the project, members of the plaintiff homeowners' association began to experience water intrusion through their windows and roofs. The plaintiff homeowners' association commenced this action against the developer and various subcontractors to recover monetary damages caused by these deficiencies based on negligence, strict liability and breach of warranty theories of recovery. The plaintiff's structures then suffered significant damage as a result of the Jan. 17, 1994 earthquake. The plaintiff claimed that, but for the structural deficiencies in the project, the earthquake damage would not have been so severe. The plaintiff received a partial payment of earthquake insurance benefits ($846,000) in 1994. In or about February 1996, a fire caused significant damage to two of the project's units. The fire spread through the two units because of the lack of adequate fire blocking. The plaintiff's insurer expended approximately $300,000 undertaking the repair of these units. In addition to insuring the plaintiff for earthquake and fire damage, the same insurance carrier also issued the developer's CGL policy. Consequently, during the course of this action, the insurance carrier asserted a right of subrogation in the amount of approximately $1.2 million to recover monies paid for earthquake and fire damages which was caused or exacerbated by the construction defects.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a global settlement demand for $2.75 million, plus a waiver of the insurer's subrogation rights of $1.2 million. The defendants made a global settlement offer of $1.2 million, increased to $2 million.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed $3 million in damages (per the plaintiff) or $5.2 million (per the defendant)

Other Information

The settlement was reached approximately three years and five months after the case was filed. A three-day mediation was held before Judge James Kolts, retired, of ADR Services. Thereafter, a + day mediation session was held before Ross Hart, Esq., of the AAA, resulting in the reported settlement.


#79491

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390