This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Business Law
Breach of Contract

DL&C Cartune, Inc.; Dennis Lesavich; William Houlihan; Robert Furman v. Shanwar, Inc; Anwar Menerally and Precision Tune, Inc.

Published: May 24, 1997 | Result Date: Apr. 9, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 696233 –  $71,240

Judge

Philip D. Sharp

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Donald A. English

Mark M. Gloven


Defendant

Earl H. Maas III


Experts

Plaintiff

Thomas Lambert
(technical)

James Van Blarium
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Dennis Lesavich, his company DL&C Cartune Inc., William Houlihan and Robert Furman, each purchased Precision Tune franchise after meeting with defendant Anwar Meherally, corporate principal for defendant Shanwar Inc. The plaintiffs claimed the defendants failed to disclose to Houlihan and Furman that their sites were approved by Precision Tune in violation of its internal site selection guidelines. Plaintiff Lesavich claimed that the defendants failed to disclose the financial condition and loss history of the store he purchased from defendant Shanwar. The plaintiffs operated their stores for a period of time. The businesses were not profitable. The plaintiffs each entered into an agreements with Meherally and Shanwar Inc. to take back the stores under certain conditions. These conditions were a matter of dispute between the parties. The plaintiffs claimed that as part of the store transfers, Meherally promised to make loan payments on the plaintiff's stores. The plaintiffs claimed defendant Meherally terminated the loan payments, and their lenders foreclosed against or sold the security. The plaintiffs brought this action against Meherally, Shanwar and Precision Tune Inc. based on violations of California franchise investment law, fraud, breach of contract, rescission an restitution, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion, fraudulent inducement of agreement for transfer of possession and declaratory relief theories of recovery. The defendants bought a cross-complaint against the plaintiffs to collect on the loan made for the purchase of one store. The cross-complaint was dismissed prior to trial.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff DL&C Cartune Inc. and plaintiff Lesavich made a settlement demand of $125,000. Plaintiff Houlihan made a settlement demand of $225,000. Plaintiff Furman made a settlement demand of $250,000. The defendants made various structured settlement offers with cash of less than $50,000 and agreements for future payments.

Damages

Plaintiff DL&C Cartune Inc. and plaintiff Lesavich claimed $225,000 in damages. Plaintiff Houlihan claimed $350,000. Plaintiff Furman claimed $300,000.

Other Information

The jury found that defendant Shanwar Inc. defrauded plaintiff Houlihan in the purchase of his franchise. During trial, the defendants stipulated that Shanwar was Precision Tune's agent. POST TRIAL MOTIONS: Plaintiff's counsel indicated that the plaintiffs will file motions for new trial and for JNOV to request that judgment be entered against defendant Precision Tune, and for award of fraud damages.

Deliberation

4 days

Poll

varied

Length

10 days


#79565

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390