This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Medical Condition

Fetter v. Baron Homes, Inc.

Published: Oct. 11, 1997 | Result Date: Jul. 3, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: RCV12467 –  $135,000

Judge

Barry L. Plotkin

Court

San Bernardino Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gary A. Peterson

Michael A. Gould
(The Gould Law Firm)


Defendant

Jerry A. La Cues


Facts

On Feb. 4, 1994, plaintiff Oswald Fetter, a 60-year-old production manager for defendant Baron Homes, a manufacturer of mobile homes, was asked to assemble a crew to work the following Saturday in order to remedy a drywall problem in two mobile homes. Plaintiff was also asked to personally supervise the repair. Although plaintiff was able to round up a small crew to come to work on that Saturday, the repair was not completed that day and plaintiff did not personally appear to supervise the work as requested. On Feb. 7, 1994, plaintiff was terminated upon returning to work. Although plaintiff was suffering from Benign Essential Tremor (BET), an affliction that caused his arms and head to shake involuntarily, in the 12 years he had worked for defendant, plaintiff had missed less than 5 days of work and had experienced no prior disciplinary actions or work performance problems. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on breach of an implied-in-fact employment contract not to terminate without good cause and wrongful termination on account of his medical condition.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made no formal demand prior to trial. Before trial, the defendant offered $10,000 with indication of willingness to go to $25,000.

Specials in Evidence

$135,000

Damages

The plaintiff claimed he suffered past and future loss of earnings.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years and eight months after the case was filed. An arbitration was held on Nov. 11, 1996 resulting in a $35,000 award to plaintiff. The defendant requested a trial de novo. Per the plaintiff, defendant's motions for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict were denied on Sept. 8, 1997.

Deliberation

1+ hours

Poll

10-2 (liability), 9-3 (damages)

Length

four days


#79696

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390