This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Oct. 18, 1997

Personal Injury (Vehicular)
Automobile Accident
Rear End Collision

Confidential

Settlement –  $100,000

Judge

Arthur W. Jones

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John R. Price

Josh D. Gruenberg
(Gruenberg Law)


Defendant

Jefferi J. Hamilton


Experts

Plaintiff

Steven H. Horowitz
(medical)

Defendant

William R. Haight
(technical)

Mark Allen Gomez
(technical)

Henry J. Kahrs A.B.V.
(technical)

William L. Lukavsky
(medical)

Facts

On Nov. 11, 1995, the plaintiff, a 25-year-old soccer coach, was rear-ended at the intersection of Moraga and Balboa while stopped at a red light. The plaintiff was diagnosed with soft tissue strains. Several months later, an MRI was taken which indicated a bulged disc. According to defendant, an MRI was taken one month later which indicated a frank herniated disc. The plaintiff underwent surgery which yielded good results. Per the defendant, the plaintiff remained off work for 1+ years. The plaintiff was uninsured at the time of the accident and subject to Proposition 213. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on a negligence theory of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $300,000. The defendant made no offer.

Specials in Evidence

$34,000 $20,000 (per plaintiff); $40,000 (per defendant) None (per plaintiff); $300,000 (per defendant) none

Injuries

The plaintiff claimed he suffered a herniated disc as a result of the accident.

Other Information

The settlement was reached approximately one year after the case was filed according to plaintiffs. Defendant reports it was two years. Per plaintiff, during pre-trial settlement, the judge stated that plaintiff would be permitted to put on his general damages case but the general damages would be stayed until the constitutionality of Proposition 213 is resolved.


#79738

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390