This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Loan

Bank United v. PH Financial Inc., et al.

Published: Apr. 1, 2000 | Result Date: Dec. 3, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC195790 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Charles W. McCoy Jr.

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Anthony D. Platt


Defendant

Steven A. Wolvek

Dana Urick


Experts

Plaintiff

Craig Park
(technical)

Facts

On July 20, 1992, borrower Choung Tran contacted defendant PH Financial Corporation and completed an application for a residential loan. PH Financial obtained a credit report from Information Searching Company which revealed the existence of an obligation owed to Bank of America. The loan was opened in 1988 with no late payments in the last 12 months.
In submitting the ôTranö loan application, PH Financial also attached a copy of this credit report, and a copy of a Grant Deed signed by Choung Tran deeding his interest in a property located at 51 Hidden Valley Road to John Phan, the other joint owner and obligor on the Bank of America Loan.
Additionally, PH Financial, at plaintiffÆs request, submitted six monthsÆ worth of bank statements and canceled checks from Phan as proof that he was making all the payments due under the Bank of America Loan. This loan application was approved by plaintiffÆs predecessor-in-interest, was eventually funded and ultimately sold to Freddie Mac.
Sometime thereafter, the loan to Tran went into default with the real property foreclosed upon.
The original agreement between plaintiffÆs predecessor-in-interest and defendant contained certain warranty provisions which plaintiff claimed defendant breached.
The plaintiff filed suit against the defendant to recover damages for fraud and breach of contract as the loan was eventually repurchased by plaintiff.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $ _______. The defendant offered $_______.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and four months after the case was filed.


#80465

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390