This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Breach of Warranty
X-ray

Torrance Memorial Medical Center v. Toshiba Corporation (Japan), Toshiba American Medical Systems

Published: Apr. 8, 2000 | Result Date: Nov. 1, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: YC3030213 –  $2,789,410

Judge

Jean E. Matusinka

Court

L.A. Superior Torrance


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Samuel A. Keesal Jr.
(Keesal, Young & Logan)

Michael M. Gless
(Keesal, Young & Logan)

Elizabeth P. Beazley III


Defendant

John J. Witmeyer III


Facts

According to plaintiff, in October 1994, Toshiba installed a cardiac cath lab at Torrance Memorial Medical Center. Between October 1994 and October 1997, ToshibaÆs service department visited the hospital over 200 times in a three-year period to work on the laboratory. According to the defendant, TMMCÆs doctors complained that the fluro image on the laboratory monitor screen was fuzzy and snowy. The system passed all objective tests.
According to the plaintiff, the problems with the system affected the doctorÆs ability to clearly see the catheters and guidewires inserted into the patients during the cardiac procedures.
According to the defendant, over 1800 patients were successfully treated and the equipment never caused or even contributed to any patient problem. At trial, a former Toshiba executive testified for plaintiff that Toshiba internal documents confirmed that Toshiba was aware of this problem since 1993, yet continued to sell the lab to Torrance Memorial and other hospitals in the United States.
According to the plaintiff, ToshibaÆs internal records stated that fluro image quality with the CCD chip was the number one problem across the United States for Toshiba from 1993-1997. The jury found that there was no breach of contract, but that TMMC was entitled to its money back for the system plus additional damages for interest and attorney fees. The jury denied plaintiffÆs request for punitive damages.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $3.5 million ($4 million according to the defendant). According to the plaintiff, the defendant offered $900,000. According to the defendant, Toshiba offered to take the X-ray equipment back for a refund adjusted for the amount of use made by TMMC.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and three months after the case was filed. The case is being appealed by Toshiba.

Deliberation

two days

Poll

10-2

Length

14 days


#80504

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390