This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Declaratory Relief
Bad Faith

Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. Harry J. O'Connor

Published: Apr. 15, 2000 | Result Date: Mar. 2, 2000 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SACV961213GLT Verdict –  $623,280

Judge

Gary L. Taylor

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David A. Lingenbrink

Melissa M. Cowan
(Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP)


Defendant

Robert K. Scott
(Newmeyer & Dillion)

D. Scott Mohney


Experts

Plaintiff

R. Bruce Moricca
(medical)

Defendant

Robert Krogh
(medical)

Gus Gialamas
(medical)

Facts

Harry J. OÆConnor, a Laguna Beach resident, filed a disability claim in February 1989 alleging total disability.
He claimed that he could not perform the duties of a real estate developer due to severe asthma. OÆConnor
represented that he was unable to perform physical labor on dusty job sites.
Through investigation, Provident found out that OÆConnor was performing duties he said he could not do.
Provident argued that OÆConnor was caught by Provident investigators on video tape engaging in activity on a
job site. The tape confirmed that he was significantly exaggerating his health restrictions. OÆConnor alleged
that the video surveillance showed him doing no activities which were inconsistent with his disability claim.
Provident filed a lawsuit seeking declaratory relief that OÆConnor was not disabled. The
suit also alleged that he submitted a fraudulent insurance claim, that the policy had lapsed, and
likewise sought restitution. OÆConnor filed a counterclaim for breach of contract, bad faith, RICO
violations, conspiracy, and punitive damages. However, the court granted ProvidentÆs motion for
summary adjudication and dismissed OÆConnorÆs tort claims.

Settlement Discussions

On Aug. 18, 1998, after the court had dismissed his tort claims, OÆConnor demanded $1.125 million. Provident made no counter-proposal.

Other Information

Provident was awarded $623,800 in benefits previously paid to him. Further, the jury also awarded Provident $800,000 in punitive damages. Judge Gary Taylor thereafter ruled that OÆConnorÆs policy had lapsed and that it was cancelled permanently. OÆConnor filed an appeal.


#80548

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390