This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Breach of Implied Contract

Stephen Forer v. St. Luke's Hospital

Published: May 24, 2001 | Result Date: Mar. 21, 2001 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C994860MMC Verdict –  $385,000

Judge

Maxine M. Chesney

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen M. Murphy
(Law Offices of Stephen M. Murphy)


Defendant

Glenn Gould

J. Randall Andrada


Facts

In October 1995, the plaintiff, Stephen Forer, a 48-year-old health care professional was hired by defendant, St.
LukeÆs Hospital, as the Director of Clinical Resource Management. In the first of two performance reviews
completed by former Vice President of Patient Services, Paul Hayes, the plaintiff was given positive feedback
on his job performance.
In January 1997, Vice President Mary Coulton became the plaintiffÆs supervisor. She gave the plaintiff new
goals, including to increase the case mix index (CMI), which measures the severity of patientsÆ conditions
using various diagnostic codes and is used by Medicare as a basis of the amount of its payments to hospitals.
The plaintiff complained to Coulton and Chief Executive Officer Jack Fries that it was illegal to include in
plaintiffÆs performance evaluation a criterion that he increase the CMI as it would encourage upcoding, a form
of Medicare fraud in which hospitals assign a patient a more serious diagnostic code than medically
reasonable.
The plaintiff also complained that Coulton did not fully and properly disclose critical quality and risk
management information to the Board Quality & Service Committee and Medical Staff Performance
Improvement Committee and failed to disclose a toxic leak to the California Department of Health Services.
In subsequent evaluations by Coulton, the plaintiff was given poor performance evaluations, was relieved of
some of his job duties, and was eventually laid off on Nov. 13, 1998 with three other employees, one of which
was a managerial employee like the plaintiff. The plaintiffÆs position was eliminated due to the disbanding of
the Clinical Management Resource Division.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed $75,000 in past lost earnings, $75,000 in lost future earnings and benefits and $300,000 in emotional distress damages.

Poll

7-0 (the defendant acted with malice)

Length

seven days


#80780

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390