This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
False Arrest
Excessive Canine Force

Gonzalo Manzo Jr. v. James Fogata, John Coffelt, Joey delos Reyes

Published: Jan. 22, 2003 | Result Date: Nov. 6, 2002 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV0105718SVW Verdict –  $0

Judge

Stephen V. Wilson

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Earnest C.S. Bell


Defendant

Kevin M. McCormick
(Lowthorp, Richards)


Experts

Defendant

Van Ness H. Bogardus III
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiff, a 19 year-old male, was in the process of being chased by police officers from the scene of a burglary. The officers ordered the plaintiff to stop, remove his hands from his pockets and get on the ground. The plaintiff allegedly refused. A police K-9 dog was used and the plaintiff was apprehended. The plaintiff subsequently filed the subject suit. The plaintiff sued, initially, two officers who were later dismissed before trial, but the court allowed the plaintiff to amend the complaint to name the dog handler.

Damages

The plaintiff submitted a demand of $50,000; there was no offer.

Injuries

The plaintiff contended that he suffered numerous bite marks and wounds as well as emotional distress. He did not seek medical treatment but sought general and punitive damages. The defendant argued that there was only one bite and that the result of the bite was a minor scratch on the plaintiff's left arm. The minor wound, the defendant argued, was evidence of the minimal amount of force used to apprehend the plaintiff.

Other Information

Prior to jury selection, a pretrial motion to strike the false arrest allegations against the defendant was granted, since the use of the dog to apprehend the plaintiff was a detention and not an arrest. The defendant has indicated that a motion to tax costs will be filed.


#81066

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390