This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Failure to diagnose

Daniel George v. Robert S. Firpo

Published: Jun. 29, 2004 | Result Date: Apr. 1, 2004 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 01CC05547 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Peter J. Polos

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Frank P. Barbaro


Defendant

John C. Kelly
(Carroll, Kelly, Trotter & Franzen)


Experts

Plaintiff

Ralph S. Hanson
(medical)

Stewart H. Gleischman M.D.
(medical)

Defendant

Sandra Wallace
(medical)

Robert L. Shuman M.D.
(medical)

Facts

The plaintiff Daniel George was a 50-year-old morbidly obese diabetic who underwent a five vessel coronary artery bypass on April 28, 2000. Approximately, 10 days following his discharge from the hospital, the plaintiff complained to his cardiologist that he was experiencing drainage and potential infection from a wound in his left leg. The plaintiff was told by his cardiologist to go to the emergency room and that he would be met there by the defendant, Dr. Robert Firpo, who was the assistant surgeon for the five vessel coronary artery bypass graft procedure. According to Dr. Firpo, he visually inspected the sternal wound during the emergency room visit and found nothing out of the ordinary. The patient did, however, have evidence of a minor wound infection in the left leg and Cipro was prescribed. In contrast to Dr. Firpo's recollection, both the plaintiff and his girlfriend testified that they asked Dr. Firpo to inspect the sternal wound which he refused to do because he did not feel that it was necessary. Four days later, the patient returned to the cardiologist for evaluation. At that time, there was clear evidence of an underlying sternal wound infection. The plaintiff was re-admitted for a 36-day hospitalization during which muscle and skin grafts were performed. The plaintiff has required continual wound care treatment over the past four years and in fact part of the patient's wound is still open.

Injuries

Severe disfigurement, multiple surgical procedures, continued wound care management and pain and suffering.

Deliberation

six hours

Poll

10-2 (for plaintiff on liability), 9-3 (for defendant on causation)

Length

nine days


#81158

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390