This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Head-On Collision

Sheila Knudtson, Chris Knudtson v. Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin, Lucy Villalpando

Published: Jan. 21, 2006 | Result Date: Dec. 21, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 04AS01515 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Eugene T. Gualco

Court

Sacramento Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jay Allen Eisen

Kenneth N. Meleyco
(Law Offices of Kenneth N. Meleyco)


Defendant

Wade M. Rhyne

Arturo J. Gonzalez
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Cloie Johnson
(technical)

Nathan Cope
(medical)

John D. Hancock
(John D. Hancock Law Group PLLC) (technical)

Margo Rich Ogus Ph.D.
(technical)

Martin Blinder M.D.
(medical)

Thomas K. Shelton
(technical)

Defendant

Ruth Swiggum
(technical)

Thomas A. Boster
(technical)

Deborah Doherty
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff Chris Knudtson was injured in a head-on collision with a third-party driver. The plaintiff sustained serious physical injuries and was left mentally incompetent. The plaintiff and his wife sued the defendants for past and future medicals, past and future loss of income, emotional distress, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs alleged that the Superior Court and its clerk were negligent and in breach of a mandatory duty for failing to properly report an earlier juvenile conviction of the third-party driver to the California DMV. The plaintiffs alleged that had the defendants properly reported the conviction, the DMV would have revoked the third party's driver's license for life and thereby prevented the accident in which the plaintiff was injured.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants contended that the Superior Court and the clerk were not negligent because they reported the sentence imposed by the juvenile court judge. The defendants argued immunity, lack of negligence, lack of causation, and contributory negligence on behalf of the injured plaintiff.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs requested that the defendants make an opening offer of $5 million. The defendants refused to make $5 million offer and discussions concluded.

Result

Defense verdict.

Deliberation

eight hours

Poll

12-0 (Vallalpando not negligent), 9-3 (Superior Court was negligent), 12-0 (Superior Court's negligence not a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injuries)

Length

13 days


#81385

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390