This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Product Liability
Design Defects

Douglas Von Arx v. Max Equipment Rental, LLC; The Charles Machine Works Inc.

Published: Feb. 25, 2006 | Result Date: Feb. 2, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: GIN038509 Bench Decision –  $0

Judge

Jacqueline M. Stern

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John B. Larson
(Larson & Gaston LLP)


Defendant

Charles S. Haughey Jr.
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)

Robert Tomlinson

Kurt E. Yaeger


Experts

Plaintiff

Theodore Vavoulis
(technical)

Richard L. Pozzo
(technical)

Arnold Starr
(medical)

Michael Forney
(technical)

Defendant

Mike Henderson
(technical)

Henry M. Koffman
(technical)

Steve Andrew
(technical)

Ralph C. Engdahl
(technical)

Roger A. Thrush Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Douglas Von Arx was injured on a construction project while operating a Ditch Witch trencher designed and manufactured by The Charles Machine Works and rented by Max Equipment Rental to the plaintiff's employer, Western States Engineering. One of the bolts holding a personnel restraint bar (which was cantilevered over the digging chain as a safety bar) came to be missing, and the bar was rotated up to perpendicular to the digging chain. The trencher was operated with the chain off of the sprocket, making it more loose, and digging teeth grabbed the end of the bar and pivoted it around the remaining bolt such that the far end struck the plaintiff operator in the head, causing brain damage.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the product was defective in terms of how the restraint bar was attached to the brackets holding it over the digging chain, and that it had not been maintained in a safe condition.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants CMW and Max contended the trencher was properly designed, serviced, and maintained, was in good operating condition that the time it was rented, that the bolt was intentionally removed, that the restraint bar was intentionally elevated to a position perpendicular to the digging chain, and that the operator was negligent in operating the trencher in that condition and with the digging chain off the sprocket.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $1,950,000. The workers' compensation carrier, Harbor Specialty demanded $200,000. The defendants made C.C.P. Section 998 offers to the plaintiff totaling $100,000 and to the workers' compensation carrier, Harbor Specialty, of $30,000.

Injuries

Brain damage, residual difficulty in memory, personality changes, and multi-tasking. The plaintiff was off work for about six months post-accident. The worker's compensation lien was approximately $297,000. The plaintiff claimed medical expenses, unspecified future medical costs, and lost earnings.

Result

Defense. The defendants' motions for nonsuit after the plaintiff rested were granted. Cost bill is pending.


#81529

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390