This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Labor Code Violation
Labor-Management Relations Act, Collective Bargaining Agreement

Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local Union No. 104 v. Tri-R Steel Fabrication Inc.

Published: Mar. 28, 2009 | Result Date: Sep. 11, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIV470431 Arbitration –  Equitable Award

Court

San Mateo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Rebekah B. Evenson

Peter D. Nussbaum


Defendant

Alison L. Tsao
(CDF Labor Law LLP)

Connor J. Moyle


Facts

Plaintiffs Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local Union No. 104 and defendant Tri-R Steel Fabrication entered into a written collective bargaining contract effective July 1, 2005. The contract was set to expire June 30, 2007 if written notice of reopening was not given 90 days prior to expiration. Plaintiffs filed notice of reopening 90 days prior but defendant would not negotiate a renewal of the contract.

They entered arbitration in Denver, Colo. before the NJAB. A unanimous arbitration award was issued, directing the parties "to execute a three year agreement effective July 1, 2007." The award also set forth certain wage and fringe benefits.

The plaintiffs filed a petition to confirm the award, contending that defendant did not comply with the award as it refused to enter into a new collective bargaining agreement with the Union. The plaintiffs also claimed defendant did not comply with the employment terms pursuant to the award.

Result

Petition denied. The court found there was no evidence that arbitration terms were not satisfied, specifically, there was no proof that the parties failed to negotiate a renewal.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Feb. 21, 2008.


#81896

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390