Steven Trujillo v. City of Ontario
Published: Apr. 18, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 25, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: EDCV 04-1015-VAP Settlement – $2,750,000
Court
USDC Southern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Peter Bibring
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)
Lori E. Rifkin
(Rifkin Law Office)
Peter J. Eliasberg
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)
Dan L. Stormer
(Hadsell, Stormer, Renick & Dai LLP)
Defendant
Bruce E. Disenhouse
(Disenhouse Law APC)
Facts
The Ontario Police Department set up hidden cameras inside the men's locker room in 1996. A class of 125 Ontario police officers sued the police department for violation of their privacy rights pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, the California Constitution and common law.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that former chief Lloyd Scharf, along with Lieutenant Tony Del Rio, gave permission to install the cameras and tape the men in violation of their state and federal constitutional rights. Plaintiffs further alleged that detective Brad Schneider contacted his friend, Michael Thompson, to install the camera.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed no constitutional violation and that they were protected by qualified immunity.
Damages
Plaintiffs sought an unspecified amount.
Injuries
Plaintiffs claimed emotional distress and punitive damages.
Result
Parties settled for $2.75 million following a grant of summary judgment against Schneider regarding the Fourth Amendment cause of action and against Thompson regarding the state law cause of action, and affirmance by the Ninth Circuit of the trial court's denial of qualified immunity. The case settled on the first day of trial.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390