This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Invasion of Privacy
Fourth Amendment

Steven Trujillo v. City of Ontario

Published: Apr. 18, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 25, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: EDCV 04-1015-VAP Settlement –  $2,750,000

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Peter Bibring
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)

Anne K. Richardson

Lori E. Rifkin
(Rifkin Law Office)

Nagwa Ibrahim

Peter J. Eliasberg
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)

Radhika Sainath

Dan L. Stormer
(Hadsell, Stormer, Renick & Dai LLP)


Defendant

Celeste Brustowicz

Bruce E. Disenhouse
(Disenhouse Law APC)

Dimitrios C. Rinos


Facts

The Ontario Police Department set up hidden cameras inside the men's locker room in 1996. A class of 125 Ontario police officers sued the police department for violation of their privacy rights pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, the California Constitution and common law.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that former chief Lloyd Scharf, along with Lieutenant Tony Del Rio, gave permission to install the cameras and tape the men in violation of their state and federal constitutional rights. Plaintiffs further alleged that detective Brad Schneider contacted his friend, Michael Thompson, to install the camera.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed no constitutional violation and that they were protected by qualified immunity.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought an unspecified amount.

Injuries

Plaintiffs claimed emotional distress and punitive damages.

Result

Parties settled for $2.75 million following a grant of summary judgment against Schneider regarding the Fourth Amendment cause of action and against Thompson regarding the state law cause of action, and affirmance by the Ninth Circuit of the trial court's denial of qualified immunity. The case settled on the first day of trial.


#82047

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390