This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Peter Wilson, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Gateway Inc., et al.

Published: Jul. 4, 2014 | Result Date: Jun. 9, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:09-cv-07560-GW-VBK Settlement –  Warranty

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Lawrence V. Brocchini

Jeffrey I. Carton

Robyn C. Crowther
(Steptoe & Johnson LLP)

Joshua S. Bauchner

Matthew W. O'Brien

Jeanne A. Fugate
(King & Spalding LLP)

Christine M. Ford


Defendant

Adam M. Sevel

David M. Walsh
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)

Paul F. Rafferty


Facts

Peter Wilson filed a class action against Gateway Inc. and others, alleging their warranties had been nullified.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Gateway assigned their warranties to an insolvent company and impaired its customers' ability to obtain services they had purchased. Although Gateway was largely successful in the 1980s and 1990s, it began to lose its market share in the 2000s. Plaintiff contended Gateway then began to aggressively market its extending warranties, but disregarded its customers when it later assigned those warranties to MPC Corp.

Gateway then had its consumer business acquired by Acer Inc., who purchased Gateway for $700 million. Shortly afterwards, MPC filed for bankruptcy, effectively nullifying the consumers' warranties.

Plaintiff argued that Gateway should have been aware that MPC was on the brink of insolvency, but still transferred the warranties to MPC regardless. Based on this, plaintiff asserted causes of action for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied plaintiffs' allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The parties settled. Gateway agreed that members of plaintiff class would be allowed to submit claims for new 12-month warranties, with a value of $60.


#82898

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390