This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Constitutional Law
First Amendment
Removal From Public Meeting

Michael Hunt v. City of Los Angeles

Published: Jul. 4, 2014 | Result Date: Jun. 11, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:12-cv-07261-FMO-SH Settlement –  $215,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen F. Rohde

Lucas Oppenheim


Defendant

Sara Ugaz
(Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney)

Cory M. Brente
(Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney)


Facts

Michael Hunt sued the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles City Board of Recreation and Parks Commissioners, and Commission President Barry Sanders, claiming violations of federal and state constitutions.

Plaintiff dismissed the Board and Commission President Sanders, and the case continued against the city only.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Hunt contended that the city's policy for its public meetings selectively censored the speech of certain persons, including Hunt. On Sept. 21, 2011, Hunt, an African-American, attended a public meeting to express his views on an ordinance regarding vending on the Venice Beach Boardwalk. Hunt wore a T-shirt bearing a political message and a KKK hood. He claimed he did not act disruptively or interfere with the meeting in any way. Despite this, he was accused of wearing "offensive" clothing and disturbing the meeting, and was expelled from the room and later arrested.

Plaintiff claimed he was wrongfully cited for disturbing a lawful public assembly. Hunt asserted causes of action for violation of the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and related provisions of the California Constitution.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense contended that plaintiff was ultimately expelled for disturbing the meeting after refusing to remove his Ku Klux Klan hood and t-shirt that bore the words "[expletive] WHITE [expletive] TOO." Defendant claimed that plaintiff repeatedly asked to be ejected so that he could bring the instant lawsuit.

The city claimed that plaintiff manufactured his purported injury.

Result

The city settled with plaintiff for $215,000.


#82960

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390