This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Period

Larry Ambriz, Salvador Carrillo, Marco A. Chavez, Randall Courtney, Daniel Maldonado, Mark A. Rodriguez Sr., Alejandro Vega, Douglas Vivero, David Cintat, Manuel Salazar, Herschel Survine II, Edwin Puquirre, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of all other "aggrieved" employees v. Matheson Tri-Gas, a New Jersey

Published: Jun. 4, 2016 | Result Date: Mar. 3, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:14-cv-04546 JAK-JC Settlement –  $1,300,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Aashish Y. Desai
(Desai Law Firm PC)

Adrianne DeCastro

Leonard H. Sansanowicz
(Sansanowicz Law Group PC)

Lee R. Feldman
(Feldman Browne Olivares APC)


Defendant

Clinton D. Robison
(LeClairRyan LLP)

Vickie V. Grasu
(O'Hagan Meyer LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs Larry Ambriz, Salvador Carrillo, Marco A. Chavez, Randall Courtney, Daniel Maldonado, Mark A. Rodriguez Sr., Alejandro Vega, Douglas Vivero, Herschel Survine III, Edwin Puquirre, Manuel Arias, and David Newfield and all other aggrieved employees filed a wage and hour class action against Matheson Tri-Gas Inc. Plaintiffs were truck drivers for defendant who alleged the company failed to pay them for all hours worked.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs claimed failure to provide proper meal and rest periods, overtime and minimum wage owed in relation to meal and rest periods, failure to provide accurate wage statements, failure to provide all compensation due and owing at termination, and violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied all liability and contended that the Class Members were correctly paid and provided with all compensation and penalties due to them. Defendant denied that it owed Class Members any wages, restitution, penalties, or other damages. Further, defendant claimed that the state wage claims were preempted under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994.

Result

The parties reached a $1.3 million settlement, which includes an award of $600-$1,000 to each named plaintiff, $384,681 in attorney fees, and $6,170 in costs.

Other Information

Final approval of the settlement was granted on March 3, 2016. The case was resolved while the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was considering the issue of federal preemption as it relates to Wage claims from California truck drivers. FILING DATE: March 5, 2014.


#83156

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390