This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Bad Faith
Failure to Pay

Nippon Credit Bank, Ltd. v. 1333 North California Boulevard, et al.

Published: Feb. 4, 2003 | Result Date: Aug. 19, 2002 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 9602075 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Walter D. Rogers

Court

Contra Costa Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kevin J. Senn

Catherine S. Meulemans
(AlvaradoSmith APC)


Defendant

Robert T. Russell

Amanda Groves
(Winston & Strawn LLP)


Facts

In 1989, the plaintiff Nippon Credit Bank made a $73 million loan to the defendant, 1333 North California Boulevard, a California limited partnership, on two office buildings in Walnut Creek. The defendant Sunset Ridge was the general partner of 1333, and the defendant Sanford Diller was the president of Sunset Ridge. The 1333 North California Boulevard partnership made all loan and property tax payments for five years, until December 1944, when the partnership, under Sanford Diller's direction, determined not to pay the $358,000 property tax installment due on the 12th of that month. Nippon ultimately foreclosed on the property and took over the ownership. In 1998, a jury awarded $394,713.56, the full amount of the tax installment plus interest, to Nippon as compensatory damages for bad faith waste based on the defendant's intentional decision not to pay the December 1994 tax installment before foreclosure. The jury also awarded $8.33 million in punitive damages after finding that the failure to pay the taxes was done with malice because it was an intentional decision. The trial court remitted the punitive award to $1.6 million, which Nippon rejected. On appeal, the jury's findings of bad faith waste, compensatory damages and malice were upheld, as was the trial court's remittur of the punitive damages award. The case was remanded for retrial solely on the issue of punitive damages. (Nippon Credit Bank, Ltd. vs. 1333 North California Blvd., et al (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 486.

Settlement Discussions

No final settlement proposals were exchanged prior to trial.

Other Information

The jury determined that no punitive damages should be awarded against any defendant. A motion for a new trial was denied on Dec. 30, 2002. The court awarded attorney fees and costs to the plaintiff based upon their status as prevailing party due to the original compensatory verdict.

Deliberation

1.25 hours

Poll

9-3

Length

six days


#83392

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390