This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Rear-End Collision

Chesley R. Houske v. Linbeth Tan-Croce, et al.

Published: Nov. 11, 2003 | Result Date: Oct. 9, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: YC045542 Verdict –  $0

Judge

William G. Willett

Court

L.A. Superior Torrance


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alan G. Saler

Vernon C. Krol


Defendant

E. Michael Kwan


Experts

Plaintiff

Todd Lanman
(medical)

Defendant

Thomas F. Fugger Jr., P.E.
(technical)

Anthony Feuerman
(medical)

Facts

The plaintiff, a 45-year-old dentist, contended that the defendant was negligent in rear-ending his truck with her car. He claimed that the accident aggravated his pre-existing C7 radiculopathy. He claimed neck and upper back pain with numbness and tingling radiating into his right arm, right hand and right index finger. He claimed that these complaints interfered with his practice of dentistry, making work more difficult and requiring him to cut back his practice. He claimed that a future cervical surgery (partial C6-7, C7-T1 vertebrectomy and fusion) was necessary to end the radiculopathy. The defendant admitted liability for the accident and further admitted that the plaintiff had a pre-existing C7 radiculopathy condition. The defendant argued that there was no objective evidence to support that this low speed accident (admitted by the plaintiff's biomechanical expert) caused an aggravation of the plaintiff's pre-existing condition. The plaintiff's pre-accident and post-accident MRIs were essentially the same with no change in condition.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a C.C.P. Section 998 demand of $99,999.99; the defendant offered $10,000.

Specials in Evidence

$21,439 claim waived at trial $27,000 to $37,000 $150,000

Injuries

The plaintiff claimed that a future cervical surgery (partial C6-7, C7-T1 vertebrectomy and fusion) was necessary to end the radiculopathy.

Deliberation

70 minutes

Poll

9-3 (no causation)

Length

four days


#83738

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390