This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Sexual Harassment
Retaliation

Kathryn Frieders, Renae Kerner, Jaime Franke v. City of Glendale, et al.

Published: Nov. 25, 2003 | Result Date: Jun. 2, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC263271 Verdict –  $3,334,830

Judge

David A. Workman

Harold I. Cherness

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Christopher Brizzolara
(Law Offices of Gregory W. Smith)

Bradley C. Gage
(Goldberg & Gage )


Defendant

Sergio Bent

Jesse M. Caryl
(Bent, Caryl & Kroll, LLP)

Irma Rodriguez Moisa
(Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo)


Facts

The plaintiffs are all female officers with the Glendale Police Department. They sued the city of Glendale for hostile work environment, retaliation, failure to take corrective action, sex discrimination, and quid pro quo harassment. The plaintiffs contended that they had been asked out on dates by their supervisors, had been touched inappropriately, had been subjected to suggestive comments and sexual references, had been forced to watch a videotape depicting oral sex and had been retaliated against for filing complaints. The defendant city denied the allegations.

Settlement Discussions

The three plaintiffs collectively made C.C.P. Section 998 demand of $1,797,000. The defendant offered a waiver of fees and costs.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed damages for the alleged sexual harassment.

Result

Defense on gender and pregnancy discrimination claim.

Other Information

The plaintiffs' post-trial motions to add Government Code Section 3309.5 penalties were denied on Aug. 28, 2003. The plaintiffs' counsel has indicated that with attorney fees, the total award is expected to exceed $6 million. The defendants' motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict were denied.

Deliberation

three weeks

Poll

12-0 (as to hostile work environment claim and failure to take corrective action for all plaintiffs), 11-1 (as to retaliation for one plaintiff), 11-1 (quid pro quo claim for one plaintiff)

Length

four months


#83807

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390