Michael Burch v. The Regents of the University of California, et al.
Published: Feb. 24, 2007 | Result Date: Nov. 30, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: S040038WBS Settlement – $725,000
Court
USDC Eastern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Daniel M. Siegel
(Siegel, Yee, Brunner & Mehta)
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
Donna LoPiano
(technical)
Defendant
Judy Sweet
(technical)
Facts
Michael Burch was the head wrestling coach at the University of California, Davis, from fall 1995 through spring 2001, when his contract was not renewed and his employment was terminated. During his tenure, the record of the varsity wrestling team improved each year and had a winning record during his last year of employment.
The University claimed that it did not renew his contract because he violated University rules and was a difficult and contentious employee. Burch claimed that he was terminated because he advocated for the right of women to participate in the wrestling program and embarrassed athletic department officials who had banned women from the program.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The NCAA Division 1 wrestling program at UC Davis had languished for many years before Burch was named head wrestling coach. Several women had participated in the program and some had become internationally successful. Burch trained and supported women wrestlers, who participated against women in open and invitational wrestling meets although they did not compete on the UC Davis squad in its matches with other universities which fielded all male teams.
In Fall 2000, athletic department administrators advised Burch that women could no longer participate in the varsity program.
Burch and student wrestlers, both men and women, opposed this decision. By May 2001, there were campus demonstrations, protests by the student senate, negative newspaper articles, and criticism of the university's decision by a member of the State Legislature. University officials blamed Burch for the protests and did not renew his contract.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
University officials assert that they are strong proponents of gender equity in athletics and that their decision to remove women from the wrestling program was based upon their conclusion that women could not successfully compete with men and should not have positions on the team reserved for them. They assert that they did not renew Burch's contract because he violated various university rules and regulations, did not submit paper work on time, and was a difficult employee.
Settlement Discussions
Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller conducted a settlement conference on Nov. 20, 2006. District Judge William B. Shubb held a further conference on Nov. 30, leading to the settlement.
Damages
Burch claimed lost wages and benefits. He claimed general damages for damage to his reputation, lost career opportunities, and emotional distress, as well as attorneys' fees and costs.
Result
The case settled for $725,000 on Nov. 30, 2006, the Thursday before the Tuesday trial date.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390