This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Class Action

Johnny Wang, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Asset Acceptance, LLC and Trans Union, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companies, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Mar. 31, 2012 | Result Date: Jan. 25, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:09-cv-04797-SI Settlement –  Equitable Settlement

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Azita Moradmand

Ethan M. Preston

Suzanne L. Havens-Beckman
(Parisi & Havens LLP)

David C. Parisi
(Parisi & Havens LLP)


Defendant

William R. Brown

Joseph A. Escarez

Tomio B. Narita
(Simmonds & Narita LLP)

Jeffrey A. Topor
(Simmonds & Narita LLP)

Robert J. Schuckit

Stephen J. Newman
(Steptoe & Johnson)

Karen B. Reisinger

Mark R. Feeser


Facts

A class action was filed against TransUnion LLC and Asset Acceptance LLC by a class of individuals whose credit reports were issued to third-party users in relation to applications for credit, insurance, and employment between June 22, 2009, and Oct. 15, 2009. The reports described one or more Asset-owned delinquent accounts that plaintiffs disputed and did not have "account in dispute" or "AID" remarks.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that defendant improperly gave information to TransUnion in relation to allegedly delinquent accounts without stating that the consumer had disputed the debt. In addition, plaintiffs claimed that TransUnion issued credit reports to third parties with information on the accounts but did not state that the debt had been disputed.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the allegations.

Result

Defendants agreed to pay $1 million, providing cash payments of up to $100 for class members with credit scores that might have lowed due to the lack of an "AID" remark on their reports.


#84461

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390