Laury Smith v. LG Electronics USA Inc., Sears Holdings Corp.
Published: Apr. 5, 2014 | Result Date: Mar. 11, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 4:13-cv-04361-PJH Bench Decision – Dismissal
Facts
Laury Smith filed a purported class action against LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc. and Sears Holding Corp. in connection with six models of top-loading LG brand and Kenmore brand automatic clothes-washing machines.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Smith contended that the subject washing machines, which were advertised as "High Efficiency machines" that features "extra high" speeds that prevented or minimized vibrations and provided smooth, quiet operations during use, was defective. Smith contended that the machines' defects caused them to shake and vibrate vigorously due to unbalanced loads. The shaking and vibration, in turn, caused internal parts to become loose.
Smith asserted causes of action for violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act; breach of express warranty; breach of the implied warranty of merchantability; breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose; unjust enrichment; violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act; unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business practices, in violation of the Unfair Competition Law; false advertising, in violation of the False Advertising Law; and violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Smith's complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted.
Result
U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granted defendants' motion to dismiss. In addition, the court found that any attempt to amend the breach of warranty claims would be futile. As such, the judge dismissed Smiths' first through fifth causes of action, and the ninth cause of action with prejudice. However, the court granted Smith leave to amend her other claims.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390