This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Battery
Unlawful Practice of Medicine

Jaclyn Jang v. Brian B. Min, individually and dba Hwasim, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Dec. 17, 2016 | Result Date: Nov. 18, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC587577 Demurrer –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kenneth A. Weissman


Defendant

Roland J. Brumbaugh

John Yunhwan Kim
(Law Office of Kim Au & Associates)

Jason John Kim


Facts

Plaintiff Jaclyn Jangafter filed suit against defendant Brian B. Min after she was injured following a spa treatment she received at Hwasim Spa in Los Angeles.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that she suffered second- and third-degree burns to her private parts after undergoing a treatment at the spa in which she squatted over a toilet-type bowl to have medicinal therapeutic smoke circulate under her in order to penetrate plaintiff's private areas and skin. She claimed that she was not informed of the risk and danger of burns to her genital area and that defendant concealed this information from her. As such, she claimed that her consent was invalid because she would not have consented to the medical procedure if she had known the risks. Due to the lack of consent, the touching of plaintiff was unconsented to, and constituted battery. Furthermore, the treatment should have been performed under the supervision of a medical professional.

Plaintiff asserted causes of action for battery and unlawful practice of medicine.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that plaintiff consented to the treatment, was informed regarding the inherent risk of injury, and that he never held himself out as a being a medical professional.

Result

The court sustained defendant's demurrer with 20 days leave to amend.


#85023

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390