This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
False Arrest
Violation of Restraining Order, Sexual Assault

Zameer R. Azam v. Mark Johnson

Published: May 16, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 25, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 05CV01858(MHP) Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brook Dooley
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Ashok Ramani
(Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP)

Jennifer A. Huber
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)


Defendant

Monika L. Cooper
(Office of the Contra Costa County Counsel)

Silvano B. Marchesi


Facts

On Oct. 29, 2003, at approximately 11:15 p.m., plaintiff Zameer Riaz Azam was driving a rental pickup from San Ramon to his home in Dublin. Azam's girlfriend, 21-year-old Jennifer Bascom, was in the truck as well. They were stopped by defendant Contra Costa County deputy sheriff Mark Johnson, who ultimately arrested Azam for violation of a restraining order mandating that he remain at a minimum of 100 yards from Bascom. Azam spent one and a half days in jail. He was released after it was discovered that the restraining order containing the stay-away provision had been superseded by subsequent orders.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that he informed defendant that the restraining order had been superseded and that he had the current order in his possession but that defendant refused to permit him to retrieve the paperwork. The plaintiff also claimed he was sexually assaulted while in jail.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Officer Johnson was informed of the stay-away provision by dispatch and the terms were confirmed with the Alameda County Sheriff's office. Plaintiff alleged he had a copy of a modified restraining order in his locked briefcase, but he refused to allow officers access to the briefcase. Officer Johnson and two other San Ramon police officers were unable to persuade plaintiff to allow them access to the alleged document.

Result

Verdict in favor of the defense.

Other Information

FILING DATE: May 6, 2005.


#85778

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390