This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Police Misconduct
Fourteenth Amendment

Javier Bravo Sr., Hope Bravo and E.B. v. City of Santa Maria, Danny R. Macagni, County of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Department, Patrick Hedges, City of San Luis Obispo, Deborah Linden and County of Santa Barbara

Published: May 23, 2009 | Result Date: Nov. 1, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:06-CV-06851-FMC-SH Verdict –  Mixed Judgment

Court

San Luis Obispo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert F. Mann
(Donald W. Cook, Attorney at Law)

Donald W. Cook
(Donald W. Cook, Attorney at Law)

Cynthia M. Anderson-Barker
(Law Offices of Cynthia Anderson-Barker)


Defendant

Kristin A. Pelletier

James K. Stoddard

Clayton U. Hall
(Hall, Hieatt & Connely LLP)

Daniel S. Imber
(Imber Law Group)

Richard R. Terzian
(ARC )

Jordan Sheinbaum


Facts

On April 26, 2006, plaintiffs Javier Bravo Sr., age 58, Hope Bravo, age 60, and their granddaughter, E.B., age 8, were in their home in Santa Maria, California, when defendant Santa Maria Police Department officers forcibly entered the residence through the use of explosive devices and gunfire. The police entered the residence in order to execute a search warrant for the Bravos' son, Javier Jr. A few days earlier, a witness identified Javier Jr. as one of the suspects involved in a suspected gang shooting. Javier Jr. was a member of the Tangas, a Tanglewood area gang, and was incarcerated at the time the search warrant was executed.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The Bravos contended that the defendants violated their civil rights as provided in the 4th and 14th Amendment, and the California Constitution, when they forcibly entered their home.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants countered that the warrant was valid and the execution of the warrant was reasonable.

Damages

The plaintiffs sought unspecified damages and a civil penalty of $25,000.

Injuries

Javier Bravo Sr. suffered an injury to his elbow.

Result

On summary adjudication, the court ruled in favor of the county of Santa Barbara (and related county defendants) and the city of Santa Maria (and related city defendants), but ruled in favor of the plaintiffs against the city of Santa Barbara. Thereafter, the plaintiffs settled for $360,000 against the city of Santa Barbara. The city of San Luis Obispo was dismissed early during the trial.


#85813

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390