This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Unfair Competition

Thomas Vitrano, Belinda Vitrano, and John Santos, individually, on behalf of others similarly situated v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Nov. 15, 2014 | Result Date: Oct. 20, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:13-cv-02492-AB-MRW Settlement –  Waivers

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alexander B. Trueblood
(Trueblood Law Firm)

Nancy H. Barron
(Kemnitzer, Barron & Krieg LLP)

Brandon A. Block
(Law Offices of Brandon A. Block)

Bryan Kemnitzer
(Kemnitzer, Barron & Krieg LLP)

Elliot J. Conn
(Conn Law, PC)


Defendant

Abraham J. Colman
(Reed Smith LLP)

Raymond Y. Kim

Felicia Y. Yu

Freyaan Y. Karanjia
(Ames Karanjia LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs brought a class action against Santander Consumer USA Inc. under the Unfair Competition Law and the Rees-Levering Automobile Sale Finance Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that they purchased vehicles and entered into conditional sale contracts, which at some point defendant became the holder of. Plaintiffs alleged that after defendant repossessed their cars, defendant sent a Notice of Intent to Dispose of Motor Vehicle that failed to contain certain required disclosures. Plaintiffs further alleged that defendant sold the repossessed vehicles and falsely represented to plaintiffs that they owed a deficiency balance and collected or attempted to collect such deficiency balance from plaintiffs.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied the allegations of the plaintiffs' claims.

Result

The parties reached a settlement agreement and the court granted preliminary approval of the class action settlement. Pursuant to the settlement, defendant agreed to stop collection on settlement class members' accounts and dismiss any pending legal action against settlement class members. Defendant also agreed to change the accounts of class members who were assessed a deficiency balance to a zero balance further agreed to inform credit reporting agencies to delete relevant trade lines. Defendant further agreed to provide a 60 percent refund of amounts paid by class members towards a deficiency balance. Defendant also agreed to pay the class counsel $350,000 in attorney fees and costs.

Other Information

FILING DATE: April 8, 2013.


#86202

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390