This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Professional Negligence
Medical Malpractice

Donald Scali and Harriet Scali v. William Caton, III, M.D.

Published: Jul. 10, 1999 | Result Date: May 24, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: GC015253 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Candace J. Beason

Court

L.A. Superior Alhambra


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Marvin Louis Wolf


Defendant

Gregory M. Hulbert
(Hulbert & Hulbert)

C. Snyder Patin


Experts

Plaintiff

Kevin Gohar
(medical)

Defendant

James T. London M.D.
(medical)

Deborah M. Forrester
(medical)

Facts

In August 1994, plaintiff Donald Scali, then 53 years old, was referred to the defendant William Caton, M.D., a neurosurgeon, for evaluation of a spinal cyst. The plaintiff showed neurological deficits, reasonably attributable to the spinal cyst, for which Dr. Caton recommended surgery. Prior to admission, the plaintiff did not complain of any upper extremity problems whatsoever, and denied any type of prior shoulder problems or injuries. The plaintiff was admitted to the defendant Huntington Memorial Hospital on Sept. 7, 1994 for surgery. The surgery was apparently accomplished without difficulty; however, upon awakening from anesthesia, the plaintiff indicated that he was unable to move his right upper arm. It was subsequently discerned that the plaintiff was suffering from a torn rotator cuff in his right shoulder. The plantiffs brought this action against the defendants based on negligence and loss of consortium.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $100,000. The defendants made no offer because there was no consent.

Specials in Evidence

$40,000

Injuries

The plaintiff sustained a torn rotator cuff of the right shoulder; residual limitation of motion and unremitting pain. The plaintiff wife made a claim for loss of consortium.

Other Information

This case was originally disposed of by way of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant based upon the court's sustaining an objection to the declaration of the plaintiff's expert in opposition to the motions for summary judgment. However, it was reversed by the appellate court and remanded for trial.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

12-0

Length

nine days


#86663

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390