This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto
Dangerous Condition of Public Property

Anthony E. Santana, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Jose Martinez v. Flor Callahan, State of California, and Does 1 through 30, inclusive

Published: Nov. 12, 2016 | Result Date: Oct. 13, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC530971 Settlement –  $2,500,000

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Scott E. Boyer
(The Homampour Law Firm PC)

Arash Homampour
(The Homampour Law Firm PC)

David H. Greenberg
(Law Office of David H. Greenberg)


Defendant

Karen Park
(California Department of Transportation)

Eric Weisel
(California Department of Transportation)


Facts

On Nov. 18, 2012 plaintiff, a minor, was a passenger in a vehicle driven by his mother. As they were traveling westbound on the SR-118 freeway east of Laurel Canyon Blvd., they were involved in a collision that resulted in the death of plaintiff's mother. Plaintiff sued the driver of the other car, Flor Callahan, and the State of California.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Callahan made an unsafe lane change into his lane of travel, causing plaintiff's mother to swerve their vehicle to the right. The front tires of plaintiff's vehicle struck a curb along the road's edge, causing the vehicle to launch and strike the guardrails. The vehicle overturned and became airborne until it landed on a raised vertical pole, killing plaintiff's mother and injuring plaintiff. He claimed that the State of California was liable because of the curb/guardrail/pole configuration, which was inherently dangerous and created a trap. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for negligence and statutory liability/dangerous condition of public property.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The State of California, Department of Transportation, denied plaintiff's allegations. The State of California contended that the public property was not a dangerous condition and that Callahan's negligence was the sole cause of the collision.

Settlement Discussions

According to defense, plaintiff's initial demand was for $13 million.

Result

Plaintiff and the State of California settled through a mediator's proposal for $2.5 million.

Other Information

Plaintiff previously had settled with Callahan for $50,000.


#87143

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390