This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Failure to Pay
Sales Commissions

Richard Melbye v. Accelerated Payment Technologies Inc.

Published: May 25, 2013 | Result Date: Sep. 20, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:2010-cv-02040 Verdict –  $6,225,000

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael D. Curran
(Curran & Curran Law)

Louis A. Storrow

Susan M. Curran
(Curran & Curran Law)


Defendant

Fawb A. Schanz Sr.

Jennifer A. Awrey
(Amgen Inc.)

Arthur F. Silbergeld
(Thompson Coburn LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Richard Melbye worked for defendant Accelerated Payment Technologies Inc. (APT) and its predecessor (CAM) as a salesman. Melbye was compensated mainly on a commission-basis for marketing the software program, "X-Charge," used for processing credit cards from computerized cash registers. Melbye stated he had entered into an oral contract with the former CAM CEO, under which he was to be compensated with X-Charge commissions in the event of termination without cause.

In 2008, after CAM was purchased by a private equity firm and renamed APT, Melbye was terminated without cause. APT refused to pay any further commissions to Melbye, and Melbye filed suit.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Melbye alleged breach of contract for failure to pay post-termination residual commissions. He further alleged breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition, failure to pay due wages, and other California Labor Code violations.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
APT motioned for summary judgment, contending there was no evidence supporting an implied agreement to pay Melbye post-termination commissions.

Result

The jury unanimously found APT liable for breach of an oral or implied-in-fact contract as well as breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, awarding Melbye $6,225,000 in damages. The case is currently on appeal.


#87973

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390