This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Product Liability
Asbestos Exposure

Rick Rush, individually and successor-in-interest to Maurice Rush, deceased; Kathy Munday, Rodney Rush, and Does 1 through 500 v. Amcord Inc., et al.

Published: May 25, 2013 | Result Date: Apr. 26, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC456922 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Diran H. Tashjian

Wesley W. Wagnon


Defendant

Viiu S. Khare
(Berkes, Crane, Robinson & Seal LLP)

Shaghig D. Agopian
(Buty & Curliano LLP)

Michael J. Boland
(Imai Tadlock Keeney & Cordery LLP)

Valerie R. Ruschke

Clinton A. Johnson

James C. Parker
(Hugo Parker LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs claimed that Maurice Rush died from lung cancer in 2010, as a result of his exposure to asbestos combined with his prior smoking history.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs claimed that defendants manufactured, distributed, and sold asbestos-containing products with which the decedent worked or worked around causing the decedent to be exposed to asbestos fibers, which when combined with decedent's prior history of cigarette smoking, caused the decedent's lung cancer.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that the decedent's 80 to 100 pack a year history of cigarette smoking was the sole cause of his lung cancer.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought $4,105 in funeral expenses and stipulated to no other costs.

Injuries

Plaintiffs claimed loss of love, comfort and society and loss of their father who died at age 77.

Result

Defense verdict. Defendants' Motion for Nonsuit with regard to the survival action (plaintiffs not entitled to compensatory damages) was granted after plaintiffs rested their case and therefore, Rick Rush, as the successor-in-interest, was not entitled to punitive damages.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 6, 2011.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

10-2

Length

17 days


#88091

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390