This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Dec. 4, 1999

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Bad Faith

Confidential

Settlement –  $289,786

Judge

Gregory C. O'Brien Jr.

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mark B. Wilson
(Klein & Wilson)


Defendant

Joshua Solomon

Julia S. Swanson

Martin E. Rosen
(Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP)

John H. Shim

Jeffrey D. Horowitz

Russell H. Birner

Maryann R. Marzano
(Gradstein & Marzano PC)

Mario M. De La Rosa
(Law Office of Mario M. De La Rosa)


Facts

A Los Angeles oil company awarded a contract to plaintiff, a general contractor (the contractor), to construct a building. In October 1995, the contractor entered into a subcontract with a subcontractor to install a holding tank, fuel system and vapor piping system at the project site. Under the subcontract, the subcontractor was required to have insurance covering itself, the contractor, the oil company and to insure that each of the sub-subcontractors had insurance naming the contractor and the oil company as additional insureds. During the construction project, the subcontractor and the sub-subcontractors damaged a fuel system with a backhoe. The contractor filed a claim against the subcontractor and its insurance carrier. The contractor believed he was an additional insured under the subcontractor's policy based on the certificates provided by the subcontractor's broker. The subcontractor's insurance company denied the claim based on its position that the contractor was not an additional insured under its policy. It alleged the insurance broker had no authority to write the coverage as set forth in the certificates of insurance and the subcontractor lied on its application. The insurance company rescinded its insurance policy issued to the subcontractor. The insurance carrier for the contractor also denied the coverage.

Settlement Discussions

The court later entered judgment against the insurance broker for $165,327 in damages, $46,562 in interest, $1,500 in sanctions and $396 in costs. The contractor's total recovery was $289,786.

Damages

The contractor incurred $177,000 in damages caused by the subcontractors. The contractor recovered damages in excess of this amount because it received payments from its insurance carriers and the other defendants were not entitled to set off those amount pursuant to the collateral source rule.


#88341

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390