This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Real Estate Purchase
Real Estate

Moghaddam and Raffi v. Re/Max Beach Cities Realty, Janet Stoll and Douglas Stoll

Published: Jan. 1, 2000 | Result Date: Oct. 7, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC089772 Verdict –  $185,000

Judge

Irving S. Feffer

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Richard A. Honn


Defendant

Rebecca B. Mocciaro
(Law Office of Rebecca B Mocciaro)


Experts

Plaintiff

Joseph Montagna
(technical)

Donald Cobleigh
(technical)

Defendant

Alan D. Wallace
(technical)

Jack Eagen
(technical)

Facts

In 1987, defendants Douglas and Janet Stoll, purchased a house and lot in Redondo Beach with the purpose of demolishing the small house and swimming pool and building a larger house on the property. After the house was built, Janet Stoll lived in the house for a few years and then sold it to plaintiffs in 1991. Plaintiffs noticed some cracking in the house and reported it to their property insurance carrier. The carrier performed geological tests and examined the City records. In doing so they discovered the former swimming pool under a portion of the current premises. In the sale, no disclosure was made of the existence of the fill or the previous pool. In the Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement, when asked if seller was aware of "Landfill, compacted or otherwise, on the property", Janet Stoll checked "No". Upon further examination of the fill, it was discovered that asphalt, ducting, appliances, conduit, wood and other building materials had been dumped into the former pool prior to covering with a layer of soil and landscaping. Re-Max Beach Cities Realty filed for and was discharged in backruptcy during the pendency of the litigation. The case was continued by stipulation against a policy of insurance which Re-Max had prior to discharge. In addition, Janet and Douglas Stoll filed for and were discharged in backruptcy during the litigation and moved out of state.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand for $100,000. The defendant made an offer for $30,000 (from Re-Max), $30,000 (from Stoll)

Damages

Cost of repair for $245,000.

Injuries

The plaintiffs claimed of settling and cracking of structure. Plaintiffs demanded cost of repair.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately five years after the case was filed. Defendant Re/Max Beach Cities Realy's motion for a new trial and for Judgment notwithstanding the verdict were both denied on Nov. 23, 1998. Three mediation sessions were held before Jerry Roth on July 2, 1998, Judge G. Keith Wisot of JAMS on Feb. 3, 1997 and Judge Peter S. Smith on Aug. 9, 1996.

Deliberation

two days

Poll

9-3 (negligent misrepresentation), 10-2 (negligence and/or breach of brokers' duties)

Length

nine days


#88409

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390