This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Copyright Infringement
Foreign Moral Rights

Osama Ahmed Fahmy v. Jay-Z (aka Shawn Carter), Timothy Mosely, Kyambo Joshua, Bob Bourdon, Brad Delson, Mike Shinoda, Dave Farrell, Joseph Hahn, Chester Bennington, Big Bad Mr. Hahn Music, Chesterchaz Publishing, EMI Blackwood Music Inc., EMI Music Publishing Ltd., Kenji Kobayashi Music, Lil Lulu Publishing, Machine Shop Recordings LLC, Marcy Proje

Published: Mar. 12, 2016 | Result Date: Feb. 5, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:07-cv-05715-CAS-PJW Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jonathan L. Gottfried

Keith J. Wesley
(Ellis George Cipollone O'Brien Annaguey LLP)

Peter W. Ross
(Ross LLP)


Defendant

Christine Lepera
(Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp LLP)

David A. Steinberg

Andrew H. Bart

Daniel Rozansky
(Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP)


Facts

Osama Fahmy filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against hip-hop artist Shawn Carter professionally known as Jay-Z, music producer Timothy "Timbaland" Mosely, EMI Music Publishing Ltd., Kenji Kobayashi Music, MTV Network Enterprises Inc., Paramount Pictures Corp., UMG Recordings Inc., Universal Music., Warner Music Inc., and various others in connection with a song called Big Pimpin. The song was featured in Jay-Z's album Vol. 3...Life and Times of S. Carter, released in 1999.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff's uncle composed "Khosara Khosara." The composer's heirs licensed the work to an Egyptian company, which then sublicensed it to EMI. EMI thereafter sub-sub-licensed the work to Jay Z and Timbaland who then used a sample of the work in Jay-Z's song, Big Pimpin. Plaintiff claimed that he, as an heir to his uncle's work, retained the right to approve or reject alterations to the original work under Egyptian law's "moral rights."

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants challenged plaintiff's authority. Defendants also claimed that plaintiff lacked standing.

Result

The judge ultimately ruled in favor of the defense, finding that Fahmy had no legal or beneficial ownership right to the work after having assigned all of his economic rights in the work to another. Accordingly, the judge dismissed the case with prejudice.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 31, 2007.


#88810

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390