This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Battery
Failure to Provide Adequate Security

Wilson Kong v. London Bridge Resort, LLC, dba Kokomo Havasu; Summer Winter Action Tours, LLC, dba S.W.A.T.; Austen Specht and Jane Doe Specht; Sean Jenkins and Jane Doe Jenkins; and Does 1 through 25

Published: Mar. 12, 2016 | Result Date: Sep. 1, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1-12-CV-221052 Settlement –  $1,350,000

Court

Santa Clara Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mick Levin

Boris E. Efron
(Law Offices of Boris Efron)

David W. Wessel
(Law Offices of Boris E. Efron)


Defendant

Benjamin A. Pettit

Andrew J. Kozlow

Rodney T. Lewin

Daniel F. Crowley

Scott P. Brust
(Daniel Crowley & Associates)

Joseph J. Minioza


Facts

Wilson Kong sued London Bridge Resort LLC d/b/a Kokomo Havasu, Summer Winter Action Tours LLC d/b/a SWAT, Austen Specht, and Sean Jenkins, in connection with an alleged altercation with drunk patrons.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff was leaving a nightclub at around 1 a.m. on March 29, 2010, when defendants Specht, a minor, and Jenkins confronted him. They were then involved in a scuffle in which plaintiff claimed he sustained head injuries. Plaintiffs contended that the defendants had consumed alcohol on the premises, and were allegedly intoxicated when the accident occurred. Plaintiff claimed the attack occurred without provocation and that the premises failed to provide adequate security. Plaintiff claimed that the resort and SWAT allegedly negligently allowed the two defendants Specht and Jenkins to become highly intoxicated and remain at the party.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Specht claimed he acted in self-defense while Jenkins denied ever making any contact with plaintiff. The resort, meanwhile, denied plaintiff's claims. In contrast, SWAT claimed the resort not only provided the defendants with alcoholic beverage, but also prevented it from hiring additional security that would have averted the alleged incident.

Settlement Discussions

Kong made a CCP 998 demand of $1.25 million to the resort, $100,000 to Specht, and $50,000 to Jenkins. London Bridge made a CCP 998 offer of $600,001.

Damages

Kong requested $64,869 in medical expenses and $110,313 in lost wages. He also requested an unspecified amount in past and future pain and suffering damages.

Injuries

Kong claimed a serious brain injury resulting in him having to be placed in a medically induced coma for three days. He continued to suffer headaches and vertigo as a result of his injuries as well as tinnitus, short-term memory impairment, loss of the sense of smell and other issues. Kong had a reasonably good recovery and was able to graduate from college, and has been employed since his graduation.

Result

The parties reached a settlement. The resort agreed to pay Kong $1.2 million, Specht $100,000, and Jenkins $50,000.

Other Information

SWAT settled for a confidential amount. FILING DATE: March 21, 2012.


#88880

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390