This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dental Malpractice
Negligent Care

David Shepps v. Farzan Alami-Rad, D.D.S.

Published: May 2, 1998 | Result Date: Feb. 26, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 704938 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Judith D. McConnell

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Charles L. Abrahams


Defendant

John D. Alessio

David G. Brown


Experts

Plaintiff

Ronald Evasic
(medical)

Defendant

Daniel Hiser, M.D.
(medical)

Grey Cunningham
(medical)

Facts

On July 20, 1995, plaintiff David Shepps, age 50, first saw defendant Dr. Farzan Alami-Rad, a dentist, for a root canal on tooth No. 3 and replacement of the bridge on teeth Nos. 20 through 22. Rad agreed to use carbocaine, an anesthetic which does not contain epinephrine, as requested by the plaintiff. On July 28, 1995, Rad did the root canal on tooth No. 3. During the procedure, Rad gave the plaintiff three injections of anesthetic. The plaintiff admitted the first two injections were carbocaine, but claimed the third injection was an anesthetic containing epinephrine. The defendant contended he used carbocaine, for the third injection. The plaintiff also contended defendant negligently broke a file in tooth No. 30 during the root canal and failed to replace the bridge. Dr. Rad denied all liability. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on a dental malpractice theory of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The defendant made a C.C.P. º998 offer for a waiver of costs.

Specials in Evidence

$____________ $____________ $____________ $____________

Damages

The plaintiff asked the jury to award $73,000 per year for the rest of his life. Economic damages were precluded after directed verdict by the defense. Damages were limited to general pain, suffering and emotional distress.

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged psychological damage, requiring future psychological care.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year after the case was filed.

Deliberation

3½ hours

Poll

11-1 (negligence); 12-0 (battery)

Length

five days


#89131

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390