This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Breach of Contract
Mold

Philippa Weld v. Montecito Retirement Association Inc., dba Casa Dorinda

Published: Apr. 15, 2006 | Result Date: Jun. 13, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 01131240 Verdict –  Defense.

Judge

Thomas P. Anderle

Court

Santa Barbara Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brook J. Carroll

Larry D. Hines


Defendant

Lane E. Webb
(Lynberg & Watkins PC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Joseph C. Spurgeon
(technical)

Defendant

Daniel M. Baxter
(technical)

Facts

In 1994, Philippa Weld moved into an apartment at a retirement community known as Casa Dorinda. Thereafter, Weld, who was 82 years old, sued Montecito Retirement Community Inc., which operated Casa Dorinda, for breach of contract and nuisance relating to mold exposure occurring in her apartment.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $60,000 and the defendant made a C.C.P. offer of $5,000. The Court found that the defendant's offer was made in bad faith.

Damages

The plaintiff made claims for property damage to her purses, shoes and books which had sentimental value. The plaintiff also sought damages for costs she incurred in performing environmental testing for her unit, totaling over $10,000. The plaintiff withdrew her personal injury claims prior to trial.

Result

The jury returned a defense verdict after determining that the defendant did not breach its contract with the plaintiff and was not liable for nuisance.

Other Information

On the second to last day of trial, in front of the jury, the defendant's chief executive officer paid the plaintiff over $5,700 for the environmental testing costs. Post-trial, the defendant was awarded $138,000 in attorney fees and costs. The Court denied the defendant's request for expert fees of approximately $16,000 because of it had found that the Defendant's C.C.P. offer of $5,000 was made in bad faith. The plaintiff appealed both the underlying judgment and the award of attorney's fees. Per plaintiff's counsel, the parties later settled for $85,000 in exchange for full satisfaction and dismissal of appeals.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

12-0

Length

five days


#89148

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390