This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Product Liability
Negligent Repair

David Riley v. California Crane Testing Co., Coast Crane, National Crane

Published: Dec. 10, 2005 | Result Date: Jun. 29, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SCV231808 Bench Decision –  $0

Judge

Raymond J. Giordano

Court

Sonoma Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael D. Green
(Abbey, Weitzenberg, Warren & Emery PC)

W. Barton Weitzenberg


Defendant

Peter J. Linn
(Bishop Barry)

William S. Kronenberg
(Kronenberg Law PC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Glen R. Stevick Ph.D., PE
(technical)

John W. Davis
(technical)

Defendant

Delmon Sailors
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff David Riley, a 42-year-old tree trimmer worked for Sandborn Tree Service, in Petaluma. On Feb. 10, 2002, he was power-washing a Model 5T National Crane in the service yard of his employer when the truck-mounted crane abruptly descended and crushed him. The crane was manufactured by National Crane of Manitowoc, Wis. Moreover, the crane was recently repaired by Coast Crane, Seattle, Wash. The Applegate-based California Crane Testing Company had inspected it and listed all the necessary repairs. Riley sued California Crane Testing Company and Coast Crane for negligent repair and National Crane for products liability claiming multiple injuries resulting from the winch brake on the crane being out of adjustment. Riley settled for undisclosed sums with California Crane Testing Company and National Crane. However, the case proceeded to trial only against Coast Crane. The case was bifurcated with a bench trial for liability and then, if warranted, a jury trial on damages.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $400,000 C.C.P. Section 998; and the defense offered $101,000.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed about $300,000 in past medical costs and about $50,000 in future medical costs. The plaintiff also claimed about $80,000 in past lost earnings, $200,000 in future lost earnings and an unspecified amount in pain and suffering damages. The plaintiff claimed that the accident made him unable to continue working as a tree trimmer and that regardless of undergoing vocational rehabilitation, he had been unable to find work.

Injuries

The plaintiff suffered a concussion, orbital crush injury and related injuries requiring multiple surgeries.

Result

The judge rendered a decision in favor of Coast Crane.


#89157

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390