This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Trip and Fall

Kalina Angelova v. City of Los Angeles

Published: Aug. 27, 2011 | Result Date: Nov. 22, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: LC082541 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Van Nuys


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Andrew C. Bryman
(Bryman & Apelian)


Defendant

John A. Wright
(Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney)


Experts

Plaintiff

Harvey Cohen
(technical)

Ross Nathan
(medical)

Defendant

Taryn Johnson
(technical)

Robert D. Shlens
(medical)

Facts

Kalina Angelova was walking along on a sidewalk with her husband at night when the front of her foot allegedly struck a two-inch elevated seam in the concrete sidewalk, causing her to pitch forward. As she fell forward, she extended her hands in an attempt to break her fall. She landed on her right wrist. Although the incident occurred a block away from her residence, she claimed it was the first time that she had walked on the subject sidewalk.

Angelova sued the city of Los Angeles for premises liability, alleging that the city had notice of the elevation caused by a tree root expanding beneath the sidewalk. She argued that the city should have had notice of the dangerous condition given that it had performed numerous sidewalk repairs in the neighborhood in recent years.

A safety expert concluded that any elevation more than a quarter-inch was a dangerous condition because it interfered with the average stride of a person's gait, and thereby created a tripping hazard. The defect was augmented due to the low visibility of the nighttime condition.

The city denied the allegations and argued that the subject sidewalk did not constitute a dangerous condition, and that it had no notice of it.

Damages

Angelova sought $500,000 for past and future medical expenses as well as pain and suffering.

Injuries

Angelova was driven to the hospital by her husband where she was admitted and diagnosed with a compound fracture to the distal radius in her right, dominant arm. A plate and screws were inserted in her arm and she underwent months of rehabilitation and follow-up examinations. A non-treating expert opined that she might require a future surgery or two to remove the hardware and replace it. She claimed she was in chronic pain and depended on her husband for her daily necessities as a result of her injuries.

Result

The jury rendered a defense verdict. Even though it found that there was a dangerous condition, it determined that the city had no notice of it.

Deliberation

three hours

Poll

11-1

Length

six days


#89400

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390