This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Employment Discrimination

Mary Louise Kenefick, Ph.D. v. The Regents of the University of California

Published: Jan. 1, 1999 | Result Date: Oct. 23, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: DUM0001711 Arbitration –  $129,684

Judge

Patricia Herron

Court

Case Not Filed


Attorneys

Claimant

Daniel M. Siegel
(Siegel, Yee, Brunner & Mehta)

Randolph Hunter Pyle
(Hunter Pyle Law)


Respondent

Edward M. Opton Jr.


Facts

From 1984 to 1990, Mary Louise Kenefick, Ph.D., was employed as the assistant editor of the Index of Foreign Legal Periodicals, a publication based at the Law Library at Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley. Following a series of disputes with her supervisor, Kenefick filed a grievance protesting her treatment, alleging among other things, sex discrimination, denial of promotions, and reduction to half-time status. On May 23, 1991, arbitrator Andria S. Knapp ruled, in part, that Kenefick should be restored to a full time position with back pay and interest. The University rejected part of the arbitrator's advisory decision. Kenefick then filed two lawsuits, one for sex discrimination and the other seeking to enforce the arbitrator's decision. Following mediation with Judge Patricia Herron, the parties entered into a binding settlement of their disputes in January 1994. The recent arbitration arose from Kenefick's claim that the University violated the provision of the settlement agreement requiring that she be placed on a list for preferential rehire for a period of one year.

Settlement Discussions

The claimant made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $______________. The respondent made a C.C.P. º998 offer of compromise for $__________________ .

Other Information

The award was reached approximately two years after the case was filed. Following Judge Herron's first arbitration decision in March 1998, the University sought to vacate the portion of the award that granted Kenefick her attorney fees and costs. Judge Henry Needham of the Alameda Superior Court remanded the matter to Judge Herron to clarify whether she had concluded that the University had violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and to set out the legal basis for the attorney fee award. In her Oct. 23, 1998, supplemental decision, Judge Herron concluded that the University had breached the covenant and that Kenefick's attorney fees were an item of damages caused by the breach. The attorney fees and costs issue will again be submitted to Judge Needham.

Length

5½ days


#89825

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390