This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Breach of Contract

Gerald Horwitz, et al. v. Datametrics Corporation

Published: Jan. 1, 1999 | Result Date: Sep. 28, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC163475 Bench Verdict –  $1,693,820

Judge

J. Stephen Czuleger

J. Stephen Czuleger

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael J. Faber
(Law Offices of Michael J. Faber)


Defendant

Ernest Cordero Jr.
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)

Abby B. Silverman


Experts

Plaintiff

David Hahn
(technical)

Richard M. Foster
(Foster Advisors PLC) (technical)

Dann Angeloff
(technical)

Defendant

Daniel Ginns
(technical)

Hugh C. Friedman
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiffs were the president/chief executive officer and three senior vice presidents of defendant Datametrics Corporation. In October 1996, a group of investors sought to take control of the Board of Directors. The outgoing board, fearing that the investors would be able to mount a successful, but expensive proxy fight, voluntarily relinquished their control in exchange for the investors' commitment to provide up to $1.5 million in financing to the corporation. Also, and without telling the investors, the outgoing Board of Directors approved "golden parachute" agreements for the four senior officers, which agreements provided for two years compensation for each of them in the event they were terminated without cause following a change in control of the Board of Diectors. The golden parachute resolution was approved on Oct. 7, 1996, and the change of control occurred on Oct. 8, 1996. The agreements were not written and signed until the following week. On October 11, the new controlling members of the Board of Directors learned of the existence of the golden parachutes and demanded that plaintiffs rescind them. The plaintiffs refused, and on October 23, they were fired, and the board repudiated the golden parachutes. The plaintiffs brought this wrongful termination action against the defendant based on a breach of contract theory of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs demanded $500,000, increased to $900,000 one week before trial. The defendant made no offer.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed two year's compensation plus interest, plus attorney fees.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years after the case was filed.

Length

one week (Bench Trial)


#89859

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390