This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Disability Payment
ERISA

Rose Wood v. Xerox Corporation Long-Term Disability Income Plan, Prudential Insurance Company of America

Published: May 12, 2007 | Result Date: Dec. 5, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C05-00556JF Bench Decision –  $243,605

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Charles B. Perkins


Defendant

Dennis J. Rhodes
(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP)

Adrienne Clare Publicover
(JAMS)


Facts

Plaintiff Rose Wood worked for Xerox Corporation fabricating prototype semiconductor chips, which required extensive use of her upper extremities. She became disabled in 1999 with complaints of pain, weakness and numbness in her upper extremities. In January 2000, cervical spine surgery was performed, but did not have a good result. Her claim for disability benefits under the Xerox Employee Benefit Plan was initially paid, but ultimately denied. The plaintiff exhausted multiple levels of administrative appeals before filing suit.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that she meets the plan’s definition of disability because she is unable to perform the material and substantial duties of any gainful occupation for which she is reasonably fitted by education, training or experience due to a preclusion from repetitive use of her upper extremities, which is supported by treating and examining physicians.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendants contended that the plaintiff retained sufficient functional capacity to perform other occupations, and therefore she did not meet the definition of disability.

Result

The plaintiff first obtained partial summary judgment that the standard of review is de novo. The plaintiff then obtained summary judgment that she is entitled to long-term disability benefits. The parties stipulated to payment of retroactive benefits due ($164,226), reinstatement into the plan, prejudgment interest ($19,056) and attorney fees and costs ($60,323) and the court entered judgment on the stipulation.


#89982

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390