Edward Von Sonn v. Bernard Friedman
Published: Jan. 30, 2010 | Result Date: Jan. 7, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: SC099701 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Santa Monica
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Morris S. Getzels
(Morris Getzels Law Office)
Defendant
Daniel K. Kramer
(Kramer Trial Lawyers APC)
Experts
Plaintiff
Neal Shanblatt
(medical)
Defendant
James G. Kent Ph.D.
(medical)
Hillel Sperling M.D.
(medical)
Facts
A vehicle driven by defendant Bernard Friedman rear-ended a vehicle driven by plaintiff Edward Von Sonn. Von Sonn sued Friedman for vehicular negligence.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Von Sonn contended that Friedman's negligence caused the accident.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Von Sonn argued that the accident was caused by a dangerous lane change made by Von Sonn. Further, Von Sonn suffered from the complained of injuries prior to the accident and his symptoms did not change following the accident.
Settlement Discussions
Von Sonn demanded $40,000 and Friedman offered $500.
Damages
Von Sonn sought $142,000 in damages, which included $22,000 in medical specials, $60,000 in future medical care, and $60,000 for pain and suffering.
Injuries
Von Sonn's claimed injuries included lower back, hip, knee, and neck injuries, and a pinched nerve in the lumbar spine, which caused pain in the plaintiff's lower extremities.
Result
The jury found in favor of Friedman.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Sept. 10, 2008.
Length
three days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390