This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Birth Injury

Plaintiff v. Doe Hospital, Roe Physician

Published: Mar. 6, 2010 | Result Date: Jan. 18, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: Case I.D. Confidential Settlement –  $2,000,000

Court

L.A. Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Russell S. Kussman


Defendant

David J. O'Keefe
(Bonne Bridges Mueller O'Keefe & Nichols)


Experts

Plaintiff

Donna M. Barras
(medical)

Zane A. Brown
(medical)

Kathleen Mcconnell
(medical)

Ronald S. Gabriel M.D.
(medical)

Barry D. Pressman M.D.
(medical)

Joyce Elaine Pickersgill
(technical)

Vickie Twitchell
(medical)

Maureen Sims
(medical)

Barry S. Schifrin
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff is a two-year-old child whose parents were living in the United States while her father was studying for his Ph.D. at a Los Angeles University. Her mother became pregnant and delivered the plaintiff at a local hospital shortly before returning to their native country in South America. For several hours prior to the delivery, the baby's heart rate began to show signs of 'fetal intolerance to labor.' Labor augmentation with Pitocin was problematic, and the baby developed signs of distress as the mother entered the second stage of labor. The nurse called the obstetrician to the hospital, and when he arrived, the baby needed urgent delivery. The physician delivered the infant via vacuum extraction, through thick meconium. Although the baby was not substantially depressed at birth and her acid-base status was not significantly deranged, she suffered intercranial hemorrhages and dissections of one or both of her carotid arteries. These led to severe cerebral ischemia, with resultant cerebral infarcts and, ultimately, catastrophic brain damage.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff claimed that the nurse mismanaged the Pitocin infusion and then waited too long to call the obstetrician to the hospital. Once the obstetrician arrived, he performed a traumatic vacuum extraction, rather than proceeding with a safer, more controlled, cesarean section. As a result, the baby suffered mechanical trauma to the intracranial contents as well as the arteries feeding her brain, leading to severe and permanent brain damage, including cerebral palsy, spastic quadriparesis, developmental delay, seizure disorder, and mental retardation. She will need round-the-clock care for the rest of her life in South America.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendants claimed that the Pitocin management was appropriate and the doctor was called to the hospital in a timely fashion. The vacuum extraction was expeditious and non-traumatic as the baby was delivered without any difficulty. The child had 'perinatal strokes,' which were unrelated to any events during the labor and delivery. In terms of damages, plaintiff's life expectancy is significantly shortened; moreover, economic damages are substantially less in their South American country.

Result

The parties settled, with $1 million paid for by the physician's full insurance policy and the hospital matching the contribution.

Other Information

FILING DATE: June 2008.


#90798

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390