This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Hostile Work Environment
Pregnancy Discrimination

Corey Stewart v. Peter Starcevic, SD Fitness Centers Inc.

Published: Mar. 18, 2006 | Result Date: Feb. 9, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: GIE022783 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Eddie C. Sturgeon

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William J. Beckwith

Claudine Ruiz


Defendant

George L. de la Flor


Experts

Plaintiff

Michael G. Willoughby
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Corey Stewart claimed hostile work environment based upon comments and jokes of a sexual nature
made by defendant Starcevic over a period of nine months of employment. The plaintiff claimed that many
comments were directed at her, and that many others occurred either in her presence or that she heard about
them through other employees. The plaintiff also claimed that her hours were cut after it was learned that she
was pregnant and claimed that she was terminated due to her pregnancy.
The defendant denied that the plaintiff was terminated and claimed that she quit, or at least that company
management did not authorize her termination. The defendant maintained that the plaintiffÆs hours were cut
due to her scheduling availability issues, and her own poor performance. The defendants admitted to many of
the alleged comments, but maintained they were made as a joke and not for any sexual purpose.
The defendant maintained that the nature and frequency of the alleged conduct were insufficient to be considered
severe or pervasive. The defendant further maintained that, based upon her own conduct, the plaintiff was not
subjectively offended by said comments based on her own conduct. The plaintiffÆs was one of five suits by
former employees of SD Fitness Centers. The other four quit. In the instant case, the plaintiff claimed she was
fired, but the defendant claimed that she quit. Three of the other four cases settled, while the fourth was
dismissed on summary judgment.

Settlement Discussions

The defendant made an early C.C.P. Section 998 offer of $5,000. The defendant made a pre-trial C.C.P. Section 998 offer of $40,000, plus costs (but exclusive of attorney's fees). The plaintiff made a pre-trial demand of $325,000.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed loss of earnings plus post-termination loss of earnings of $3,700.

Result

Defense verdict.

Other Information

The case was mediated before mediator Douglas Barker but no settlement was reached.

Poll

12-0, 11-1

Length

nine days


#91701

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390