This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Pedestrian
Wrongful Death

Irene Wong, Judy Wong, Susan Leong, Johnny Leong, Jimmy Leong, Estate of Homer Leong v. Jose Fuentes, Kudos Transportation Inc.

Published: Apr. 22, 2006 | Result Date: Feb. 9, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: RG05214577 Settlement –  $500,000

Judge

Thomas A. Rasch

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William C. Kwong
(Office of the Attorney General)

Dale Minami
(Minami Tamaki LLP)


Defendant

Ayhan M. Menekshe


Facts

In February 2005, Homer Leong, 85, was walking on the eastern side of Oak Street in Oakland. He came up to the 5th Street intersection and waited for the pedestrian light at the crosswalk curb. Defendant Fuentes was driving an 18-wheel tractor-trailer for defendant Kudos. He stopped at the intersection at Oak Street and 5th Street.

When the pedestrian and traffic lights turned green, Leong moved into the crosswalk. Defendant Fuentes began turning right onto 5th Street. He hit and killed Leong.
Defendant Fuentes was arrested after leaving the scene. During his criminal trial, he pleaded no contest to misdemeanor manslaughter.

Leong's widow and children sued defendant Fuentes for negligent operation. They sued defendant Kudos for negligent hiring and negligent supervision.

Injuries

The accident resulted in Leong's instant death. The plaintiffs alleged loss of care, comfort and society. Although at the time of his death, Leong was no longer the family's financial provider, he was the patriarch and held the family together emotionally. Further, the plaintiffs claimed that in the Chinese culture, children are suppose to give back to their parents. Thus, because the plaintiffs could not give back to their father, they claimed that his death was a source of guilt and anguish.

Result

Following a one-day mediation conference, the parties settled. The settlement demand by the plaintiffs was $1.5 million; the settlement reached was $500,000 for all plaintiffs.


#91736

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390