This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Intentional Misrepresentation
RICO

Sichuan Kangda Decoration & Printing Co., Ltd. v. Huang Yamenga, Jian Wei, et al.

Published: Sep. 9, 2000 | Result Date: Jul. 27, 2000 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV9913202R Bench Decision –  $0

Judge

Manuel L. Real

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Belinda S. Lee
(Latham & Watkins LLP)


Defendant

Gary C. Nawa

Michael M. Levin

Allan B. Cooper


Facts

The plaintiff, a People's Republic of China corporation, alleged that the defendants, various Chinese nationals and several Hong Kong, California and Nevada corporations, defrauded plaintiff of over $5 million through sham letter of credict transactions. The plaintiff alleged that the scheme involved the presentation of false shipping documents to facilitate the payment of the letters of credit to companies located in Hong Kong. The plaintiff alleged that the scheme was controlled from Los Angeles, and that the proceeds of the transactions were invested in Los Angeles. The plaintiff contended that they were entitled to recoup over $5 million, plus interest and punitive damages. The plaintiff brought the lawsuit based on RICO, civil conspiracy, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, constructive trust and unfair competition (B&P 17200). The defendants contended that the transactions occurred in China, between Chinese nationals and corporations, and that the choice of forum was inappropriate (forum non conveniens). The defendants also contended that the plaintiff had assigned their rights to collect this alleged debt to a non-party Chinese corporation and that the plaintiff's failure to join the assignee made it impossible to maintain this action. Finally, the defendants contended that the RICO claims were insufficiently plead and that absent the RICO claims, there was no basis for federal jurisdiction.

Other Information

PLEASE PROVIDE THE NAME OF PLAINTIFF ATTY. FROM LATHAM & WATKINS __________________. ATTY. FROM ERVIN, COHEN & JESSUP ______________


#93112

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390