This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Breach of Duty
Failure to Purchase Corporate Shares

Dale Novasky v. Jeffrey Adjustment Service, Inc., Charles Ward, Robert Gibson

Published: Jul. 19, 1994 | Result Date: Mar. 7, 1994 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 922006827 –  $109,719

Judge

Evan E. Sperline

Court

Grant Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Craig Evezich

Robert W. Novasky


Defendant

James Danielson

J. Kirk Bromiley


Experts

Plaintiff

Rick Honsowetz
(technical)

Defendant

Jeff Neherer
(technical)

Facts

In 1989, Plaintiff Dale Novasky, at 61 years of age, tendered his resignation as an insurance adjuster for the corporate Defendant Jeffrey Adjustment Services, Inc., a closely held corporation. He was leaving to become a minister. He tendered his resignation to the remaining shareholders upon the condition that his share of stock be purchased by the corporation. However, he did not resign as president of the corporation or as a member of its board of directors. During the next year and one half, four remaining members of the corporation allegedly assured Plaintiff that they were attempting to arrange for the purchase. Subsequently the corporate members arranged to purchase 2 other people's shares, but not Plaintiff's.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff contends he demanded $90,000 (including all attorney fees) and Defendants offered $20,000.

Damages

Share of stock, prejudgment interest, and attorney's fees.

Other Information

The Court held that the corporation was a "close" corporation and as such, its shareholders, directors, and officers owed the Plaintiff an "equal opportunity" to sell an identical number of his stock to the corporation upon the same terms as it had done with the two other shareholders. The "equal opportunity" rule adopted by the Court was based upon the case of Donahue v. Rodd, 328 N.E.2d 505 (Mass. 1975) and similar case law in Oregon and Alaska.

Deliberation

6 hours

Poll

10-2

Length

5 days


#93585

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390